When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud should be downloaded all together, while streaming. Merely to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.
Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.
When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks less than the next cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).
Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.
File sharing through the URL (but that is as far as another cloud is concerned).
It has a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.
Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.
Compared to the next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for a few selected sound sources. Another cloud only must be in a folder.
You have to share a URL and that means you can't share music files or videos.
According to the report, there is a saying that N drive looks like a local drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, which is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It's a whole lot worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks in it. It's much better to just tidy up the synchronization folder.***
It is very specialized in playing music. Specifically, it is the only cloud that may play sound sources within an environment similar to MP3 players we are acquainted with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play up to 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it's often cut off at that point)
It includes a large capacity. This is a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services all together, which have poor quality of media access in cloud services.
You can substitute the end drive above. In particular, if a picture is contained in a document, it is rarely opened properly.
Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. I feel like it's about once every two hours. And when you pay attention to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets take off more often. So when it's in that state, you will need to discover the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.
The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are for sale to file viewing. Aside from those points, you'll find nothing to say even if it is almost a webhard level.
Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)
It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.
It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By setting up only offline views, the files you work on can continue to be reflected in the cloud in real time. This can be a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.
It is easy to interact with other Google services such as for example Gmail.
If you don't upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file does not account for cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just use the web app, the capacity of the Google drive is infinite).
Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos can be played right away. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me.
There are probably the most apps which might be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs on the computer. It's a tiny problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment.
Upload a small pdf file and change it out to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.
There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There's a testimony that it is a block after a large amount of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy.
If you use Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it is the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and use MS word, right?)
Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude compared to office programs applied to computers.Is it obvious?)
It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a certain amount of buffering time for every photo). However, in the event that you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in one folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, you can freely specify before start of playback. It's the best in the world with regards to media reading.
There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.
The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster than the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.
The file capacity limit which can be uploaded from a free account may be the largest. 300MB.
The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you're going to share large files.
The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.
Price compared to capacity may be the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards...
There exists a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected in real time when working on documents.
Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.
The dropbox itself can't be documented.
There are probably the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you need to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you want through the app drive and work on it leisurely.
Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are provided. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if you can find multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can even be flipped on the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file.
File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to share data conveniently with little usage of the net page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.
Slow. Not paid people.
Media access is very disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's easier to just do it on some type of computer than pay attention to it for a test.
The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.
In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.
If you don't install Boxeditor, the documentation will undoubtedly be written with an extension that can only be written on Box (it works, so it is better than Dropbox, but it's less than Google Drive).
It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. However the pace is still a bit slow.***
The writing function is very powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there's also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.
The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it isn't that strong a difference.
It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.
My website - 다운로드 사이트